Clinton and Obama seem to be conflicting on opinions, so I read up on some articles on both and I found this to be interesting about Clinton:
"Mrs. Clinton has disagreed with Mr. Obama’s support for presidential-level
talks with leaders of nations like Iran and North Korea" click here for the article
How are you sapose to lead a country and fight terrorism if you do not speak with the presidents of these opposing countries? I think not having these talks is going to lean more on the side of "not getting involved". I think it better for us to negotiate and talk to understand these countries. There is a big difference between making allies and making negotiations with your enemies. I keep reading things about how people are supporting Clinton because of her "experience". Just because you were the presidents wife does not mean you have the greatest experience. The only experience I read up on is that she has visited countries and saw the disgraceful situations, but so have other humans, prolly moreso those in the army have than her. But despite that, look at her relationship with Clinton, it does not seem to be a close one..there were many times when they were not speaking to each other, especially when Clinton had an affair. Many of my senses are telling me to lean more on Obama. Plus, honestly I would rather have a male president than a female, females seem to let feelings get in the way of sensible choices. Here are some examples that are making me feel this way about Clinton,
-Her role mostly involved what diplomats call “soft power” — converting cold war foes into friends, supporting nonprofit work and good-will endeavors, and pressing her agenda on women’s rights, human trafficking and the expanded use of microcredits, tiny loans to help individuals in poor countries start small businesses.
-She traveled to 79 countries in total, little of it leisure; one meeting with mutilated Rwandan refugees so unsettled her that she threw up afterward.
She is more for peace than war, it seems to me. I just get a bad feeling about her being presidfent..we need someone that will stand up and fight, not letting emotions drive them. I will give her props for her emotional ties to these issues and that she wants a change for them. But what about getting into the grutty parts of war, what about going out to fight even though it is ugly, can she take it as our leader? We need a strong leader, and a smart one.
I think Obama is smart for wanting to actually try and negotiate with the leaders around and get rid of possible nuclear threats.
There is still more for me to read up on..like Egypt's foreign ministry said, ""It is better for the Israeli minister to concentrate on negotiation efforts with the Palestinians, instead of speaking randomly about issues she should not be dealing with if she is not fully aware of the situation," its statement said Tuesday." ..it is better for us not to speak randomly about issues if we do not fully understand.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Clinton seems to have fallen back in the polls. People don't like her tactics - she attacks all her opponents.
from what i know, Huckabee looks the best.
oh i didn't even know anything about him, i just read a bio on him...i like him! :)
whoa seriously, where has this guy come from? i read more of what he stands for, and i totally agree with you, he stands for much of what i am
The news covers what they want to cover, bias is nothing foreign to them. This is why i found it ironic when so many news companys pointed fingers at Fox for being "biased" towards conservatives - can you say hypocrites?.
Post a Comment